SF Sellers List Low & Look for Cash Offers

Most buyers in the current San Francisco market learn quickly that most sellers are pricing their homes lower than the price they’re seeking. This is a particularly common strategy in a seller’s market. Multiple buyers become interested and write offers. Sellers then have the upper hand when it comes to selecting the highest and best offer, which often translates into countering multiple buyers and having to negotiate little.

A look at all single-family home and condo sales in the time period from March 13-April 13, 2013 provides a clear window into the current market. Of the 218 single-family homes (median price: $965,000, 43 cash sales) and 264 condos (median price: $855,000, 61 cash sales) that sold, only a handful sold for less or at the asking price.

What this means for buyers is that it’s very important to know and be at peace with your maximum price point. Particularly in centrally located neighborhoods near public transportation, retail areas and freeways, competition is strong for what little inventory exists. A good rule of thumb is to consider properties priced at a lower number.

And yes, sellers will always prefer cash transactions to those involving a loan. This is because cash offers—accompanied by proof of funds—are much more of a sure thing than a loan. There are typically no appraisers involved, and there’s no underwriting team that can possibly torpedo the transaction. Cash offers also provide flexibility for a fast close, if that’s desired by the seller.

There’s not a conspiracy among sellers to “trick” buyers into thinking they can afford a property that will undoubtedly receive multiple offers. The reality is that sellers see success among homeowners listing low and selling higher, and they simply follow that strategy. (The real estate industry isn’t terribly imaginative, in case you haven’t noticed.)

If a seller decides to buck the trend and list at roughly the price he or she really wants for the house, there’s a likely chance that buyers will dismiss the property because they believe they’ll have to bid higher in order to get the property. So that condo that’s worth around $900,000? The seller who lists at $799,000 will do infinitely better than the one who chooses to go with $875,000.

For now, the list-low strategy pervades San Francisco real estate, and cash offers are popping up with surprising frequency. As the market fluctuates, this will probably change. But it’s important to know what to expect so you can refine your own house-hunting strategy.

Is It a Good Time To Buy in San Francisco?

San Francisco has a very fast-moving, dynamic real estate market that often doesn’t reflect what’s happening across the country. For example, “hitting bottom” meant lower sales volumes, higher concentrations of foreclosures and short sales that were largely centered in a handful of neighborhoods, and many properties in prime neighborhoods still selling for more than list prices. In other words, it wasn’t exactly a real estate bloodbath in San Francisco.

I’ve recently been asked by a fair number of people whether it’s a good time to buy real estate in the city. The fact that it’s a seller’s market is giving many prospective buyers pause. Ironically, those same buyers may have been hesitant from 2008 to mid-2012—when it was a buyer’s market—because loans were more challenging to obtain, less cash was flying around, and the economy was a bit shaky.

So my response to the question about whether it’s a good time to buy? Well, I think timing has more to do with your financial situation and long-term goals than market conditions themselves. San Francisco is one of those cities that’s extremely desirable for many reasons, which is why our real estate prices are so high. If you have the ability to jump into the market, purchasing what you can afford should be the priority. We’ll never have screaming deals on property, which means that if you sit around waiting for the market to shift in your favor, you could be missing opportunities to own not only a great home, but a great investment.

I helped many clients purchase property over the past couple years amidst our downturn. And most of them could sell their homes for more money now. But many buyers sat on the sidelines, hoping prices would fall to the extent that they could swoop in and snatch up a single-family home or condo in a good area at some sort of discount. Homeowners made sure that didn’t happen, holding off on selling their own homes until prices crept back up to more desirable levels.

Which is where we are now. The scale has tipped back into the seller’s favor. I’m not sure how long this will last, but history dictates that market conditions will inevitably change. Whether it’s a good time to buy really depends on how closely your property goals are aligned with your purchasing power in the current market.

Cash Sales All the Rage in San Francisco

Cash sales became commonplace in San Francisco in 2012, and they show no signs of slowing down this year. (See “Cash Sales Soared in 2012.“)

A look at all the reported cash sales from January 1-April 8, 2013 reveals that almost a quarter of all single-family home and condo sales were cash transactions. That’s a somewhat stunning percentage, and makes a huge statement about where people are putting their money.

Most condo cash transactions took place in neighborhoods such as Pacific Heights, Russian Hill, downtown, and the more urban enclaves of Mission Bay, South Beach and SoMa. Sixteen of the 131 condo cash sales in the aforementioned timeframe sold for more than $1.5M, but 73 sold for up to $1M.

Most of the 114 single-family cash sales occurred in the Excelsior, Bayview, the Sunset, Noe Valley and Bernal Heights. Eighteen sold for more than $2M, and five sold for more than $4M. A total of 69 houses closed escrow for up to $1M.

Even TICs got in on the act, with one Mission Dolores 3BR TIC in a six-unit building on a group loan closing escrow for $2,050,000.

All of this cash activity is all fine and good for sellers, but it unfortunately can wreak havoc with comparable sales from a buyer perspective. Because many cash buyers aren’t having appraisals done, they’re more willing to throw money at a desirable property because they don’t have to worry about an appraisal coming in low and jeopardizing a loan. For example, one 3BR/1BA, 1100-square foot house on Bernal’s north slope listed for $799,000 recently received 16 offers and ultimately closed escrow in a cash transaction, with a $1.2M+ selling price. There’s no way this property would appraise were the buyers getting a loan. But with no appraisal required, such buyers are going for broke so they don’t miss out on a property they like. And a new comp is born.

Indeed, single-family home and condo buyers with all cash paid an average of 5.5% and 4.4%, respectively, over the list price. The old adage of getting a discount by paying cash apparently doesn’t ring true in San Francisco real estate.

Seller’s Market Continues in San Francisco

The real estate market in San Francisco has been bouncing off the walls since late 2012, and we’re officially in a seller’s market. Buyers are pulling their hair out in multiple-offer situations, and sellers are wondering if prices will increase as 2013 wears on.

We now have three months’ worth of sales to analyze, and that data indicates that prices are up as much as 6% over the past 180 days, particularly in the single-family home and condo markets. Indeed, the average price for a house in the city was $1,163,261 in the first quarter of 2013, and $897,278 for a condo. TICs sold at an average of $758,244 per interest.

Cash sales are continually popping up, especially in extreme multiple-offer situations. It’s gotten to the point at which buyers with loans, contract contingencies and reasonable offer prices don’t have much of a chance in a 10+-offer scenario.

But fortunately for buyers, Spring will bring with it more inventory. I’ve been selling real estate for more than ten years, and it never fails that inventory rises when the weather gets nicer. Homeowners who are wary of making a move without knowing where they’ll go next are considering short-term, furnished rentals as pit stops, or consulting a lender to see if they can qualify for what’s called a “bridge” loan that will allow them to buy first and sell second.

We’ll also be seeing many new condo developments start to sell their units this year, which will appeal to those looking for housing in prime, centrally located and transit-rich neighborhoods. (However, buyers can expect pricing for these units in the $900-$1,000/sq foot range, and only half the units in a given building will typically have a deeded parking space.)

If you’re an intrepid buyer heading out into San Francisco real estate waters, make sure you complete a solid preapproval so you’ll be ready when you unexpectedly see the home that you’re meant to buy. And if you’re a seller who’d thinking of putting your home on the market later this year, now is a good time to start consulting with your Realtor so you can put your plan in motion.

SF Sales Up Across the Board, Supes Consider Retrofit Legislation

Sales of single-family homes, condos and multi-unit buildings are up almost 7% over the past 180 days. That means buyers are looking at a competitive Spring for long-awaited inventory, and sellers are expecting the multiple-offer activity to continue.

View recent sales, stats and the latest on the mandatory earthquake retrofit legislation, Mexican Museum development downtown, and an update on Hayes Valley’s upcoming condo development in this edition of the Zephyr MarketTracker.

SF’s Seismic Retrofit Legislation on the Move

The Mandatory Seismic Retrofit Program legislation is due for its first hearing on Monday, March 18th before the Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee. Based on conversations I’ve had with various clients, friends, and colleagues, it seems like many people are a bit unclear about the details.

I’ve reviewed the legislation and also have spoken to Patrick Otellini, the Director for Earthquake Safety in the Mayor’s Office, so I thought I would share the information with you as it currently stands.

The proposed legislation, authored by Mayor Lee and six Board of Supervisors, adds a new chapter to the San Francisco Building Code that would require mandatory seismic retrofitting of existing wood-frame buildings which were built before January 1, 1978, have three or more stories—the first of which is a “soft” story—and contain five or more dwelling units.

Soft-story buildings are those that have a first, or ground-floor, level with either garage space or commercial businesses/storefronts. Soft-story buildings were responsible for 7,700 of the 16,000 housing units rendered uninhabitable by the Loma Prieta earthquake. And it’s estimated that soft-story residential buildings will be responsible for 66 percent of the uninhabitable housing following a seismic event on the Hayward fault.

Otellini estimates that there are approximately 2,800 buildings that would require retrofitting under the legislation. These buildings are most notably located in the Mission, Western Addition, Richmond, North Beach and Marina neighborhoods, according to the San Francisco Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety (CAPSS). The CAPSS study’s recommendations is the basis for the legislation.

The legislation has “compliance tiers” that guide how quickly certain properties need to complete seismic upgrade work. For example, Tier 1 properties are those that have senior centers or other care facilities on their ground floors. Tier 2 will include buildings containing 15 or more dwelling units, and after that will come buildings that have some sort of commercial/retail occupancy on their first story, as well as buildings that are in mapped liquefaction or landslide zones. The latter is the most complicated property type, as the engineering involved for dealing with liquefaction/landslide zones is more complex.

How does the city expect building owners to pay for this mandatory work? That’s not entirely clear as of yet. The legislation states that the city intends to consider the creation of an optional special tax financing program, which would be a combination of bonds issued by the city and special taxes paid by the building owner.

Another option in the works, according to Patrick Otellini, is for banks to provide financing to the building owners. Otellini was meeting with a group of lender representatives this week to gauge interest for this scenario. He mentioned the possibility of an owner taking out a loan for, say $100,000 (an average cost for this seismic work).

Assuming the Land Use Committee approves the legislation on Monday, March 18th, the item will then be heard in front of the full Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, March 26th, with Tuesday April 2nd being the final reading before the Board. Mayor Lee then has ten days to sign the legislation if the Board passes it, and it would then take effect 30 days after Mayor Lee signs it.

Of course, the legislation could go through many revisions between now and then, particularly after public opinion is heard.

Defining “Luxury” Real Estate in San Francisco

The Wall Street Journal recently ran a piece that discussed the price points that defined “luxury” in various cities. New York, Paris, London, Hong Kong and Sydney all rank among the top ten cities for luxury living, and Hong Kong is the priciest.

The real estate barometer was a luxury, two-bedroom apartment with about 1,000 square feet. The price in New York for this real estate was $2,135,000, while London clocked in at $4.1M, and Hong Kong’s estimate was $4.81M. The article didn’t cite San Francisco, so I thought I would explore what defines luxury in our city.

It’s widely believed among San Francisco real estate agents that $2M is the price point that represents luxury properties in San Francisco. However, I think that’s more the case for single-family homes. A total of 37 2BR condos sold for $1M+ from December 2012 – March 5, 2013, ranging in price from $1,025,000-$3,850,000. The average sale price in this $1M+ category was $1,423,757, and the average square footage on these 2BR units was 1452.

So I’d say that you definitely get more for your money in San Francisco these days, particularly where condos are concerned.

Yours Truly, Quoted on KQED About TIC Legislation

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee was scheduled to vote today on legislation that will potentially allow some TIC homeowners to bypass the condo lottery and pay a one-time fee to complete their unit’s conversion. As is typical with any legislation that affects homeowners and tenants, the issue is controversial.

And the vote has been delayed by a month, as Supervisor Mark Farrell reportedly wants additional time to talk with tenants’ rights groups.

I am, of course, a homeownership advocate (and former renter). And there are two sides to every issue. But I’m thinking that there’s something to this TIC legislation that should be able to work. In a city where two-thirds of all residents are renters—and property taxes help subsidize many things here—the Board of Supervisors should take a balanced view of the condo conversion issue and update its position so we don’t have a bunch of homeowners languishing in the lottery.

Check out the story (with link to the original audio broadcast) here: “San Francisco Struggles With Decision That Could Help Some Homeowners—And Hurt Renters.”

Buyer Goes Bonkers Over Mission Dolores Units


Proving that Mission/Mission Dolores homeowners basically can’t miss in our market these days, the modest two-unit building at 3643-3645 19th Street (at Dolores) sold for what I would describe as a stunning price recently.

The main-level flat (living room, above) was vacant and unstaged. There were two bedrooms, an updated, eat-in kitchen with basic finishes, and a dining room. Downstairs was a very small, tenant-occupied studio with a sleeping alcove.

Listed at $1,225,000, the building sold to an all-cash buyer from the neighborhood for $1,510,000.

Unfortunately for a majority of buyers, it’s a challenge to compete with cash buyers who are not wildly concerned about the prices they’re paying. After all, when a loan isn’t involved, neither is an appraisal. My guess is that a formal appraisal would not have come in at value on this building, knowing the comps. But this isn’t the first instance of buyers paying too much for Mission Dolores properties; this sort of reckless real estate behavior has been happening since early 2012.

Buyers Turn to TICs in Tight Market

As condo prices climb and low inventory persists in centrally located neighborhoods, San Francisco buyers appear to be more willing to take on TICs.

A total of 66 TIC interests sold in the last quarter of 2011, at an average price of $594,127. However, buyers snapped up 94 TICs in Q4 2012, and the average price shot up by about 9% to $645,091.

In a city where the average condo price is almost $1M, TICs still represent a more affordable path to home ownership—particularly where 2BR units are concerned. Almost half of the TICs sold in the last quarter of 2012 were 2BRs, with 1BR TICs representing 32% of the total sold. The least popular TIC type was the 3BR+ unit; only 22% of buyers purchased those.

The TIC market has always been a niche one, with far less units selling than that of condos. (For example, 671 condos sold in Q4 2012 in comparison to those 94 TICs sold in the same time period.) But those TIC numbers could increase in 2013, particularly in neighborhoods such as the Mission/Mission Dolores, North Beach, Lower Pacific Heights and NoPa, which represented the most popular areas for TIC sales late last year.

I checked out a few TIC offerings on my broker tour last week, and in most cases, listing agents reported distributing multiple disclosure packages to interested buyers, as well as offer deadlines. There was a time when TICs would sit on the market for an average of 90 days, but that doesn’t seem to be the case in the current market.

TICs still carry unique risks. For example, the type of financing they require (fractional) lets you avoid a lender foreclosing on the entire building. But you’re still on title with multiple owners, which requires everyone to share responsibilities such as paying property taxes. And fractional financing is only offered through adjustable-rate loans, which can increase over time and leave you vulnerable to higher mortgage payments in the future. Additionally, your lender pool will be small. So if you’re looking to refinance, you’ll be limited to the interest rates those two or three lenders will be offering.

But a TIC is a bonafide homeownership opportunity in a city where rents have managed to hit all-time highs, and where a 2BR condo costs an average of $919,796.

All Local Worlds Collide on BlockAvenue


A new Web site called BlockAvenue.com combines “geo data” and user opinion to create an online guide that helps people understand neighborhoods, local trends, and new happenings.

The site “leverages more than 50 million data points” for the location of your choice, such as crime, transportation, restaurants, shops, school and social activity. It then mashes it up with a “proprietary social layer” (i.e., comments from users) to provide a BlockScore that will tell you how good the location actually is. Because as we all know, neighborhoods do change on a block-by-block basis in major cities, and San Francisco is no exception.

I gave BlockAvenue a whirl by typing in “Valencia and 24th, san francisco, ca.” The next page was a map of the area, showing various icons representing local businesses and amenities, as well as boxes with corresponding details for each. So along with McDonald’s, Valencia Farmer’s Market and the Mission Cultural Center, I was able to locate a sex offender on Mission Street and a ZipCar pod. I was also able to mouse over the various categories, and could check boxes if I only wanted to see crime data or just check out restaurants.

BlockAvenue seems like a good way to get to know a city on a neighborhood level. There aren’t many user comments yet, but that takes time. I’d recommend using the site, particularly if you’re deciding which neighborhoods might be a fit for you as you search for a home.

Luxury Market on Solid Footing In 2013


Sellers of properties in the $1.5M+ range found plenty of buyers on hand throughout 2012. The luxury home market steadily picked up speed as the year progressed, culminating in some pretty impressive numbers.

A total of 454 single-family homes and 185 condos traded hands in 2012 for $1.5M or more. In 2011, only 328 houses and 105 condos in this price range sold. So high-end buyers clearly moved from the sidelines last year and entered the ranks of San Francisco homeowners. Interestingly, the average luxury home prices were roughly $2.7M for houses and $2.5M for condos.

Though a majority of single-family homes unsurprisingly sold in Pacific Heights, the Lake District, Sea Cliff, Marina, Cow Hollow, Presidio Heights, Cole Valley and Noe/Eureka Valleys, a few other neighborhoods also saw some luxury action. These included Glen Park, the Inner/Central Richmond, Potrero and Dogpatch. On the condo front, luxury buyers flocked to Russian Hill and South Beach.

The mother of them all was the sale at 2901 Broadway (above), which hit the market way back in April 2007 for $55M and finally closed on December 8, 2012 for $28,250,000. (Though 2011 had its own over-the-top sale in November of that year, when 2950 Broadway sold for $29,500,000 with an $18M loan involved.) Eight other single-family homes changed hands for $10M+ last year, as well.

The most expensive condo sold last year was a 3BR unit at the Millennium Tower, which sold for $7,850,000.

As noted last week, cash sales were more common in 2012, particularly in the luxury market. Eighty single-family homes and 51 condos sold for $1.5M or more, and these homes were scattered across the city.

Cash Sales Soared in 2012


Cash buyers hit the San Francisco market with fervor throughout 2012, across all price ranges, property types and neighborhoods. Foreign buyers seemed to also be very active, wiring in large sums of cash from South America, China, and Europe.

If you’re aiming to buy or sell a property this year, I think it’s helpful to have a sense for where the cash buyers will potentially be circulating. Here’s my 2012 breakdown by the numbers for each home type:

Single-Family Homes
2012: 473 sold (2011: 61)
Average price: $1,116,511
Up to $700,000: 229
$700,000 – $1M: 109
$1M – $1.5M: 31
$1.5M+ 80
$5M+ 13
$10M+ 4
The Backstory: Always the most popular property type in San Francisco, the single-family home market was cash buyers’ primary target last year. There were almost eight times as many cash sales last year vs 2011, particularly in the sub-$700,000 segment of the market. But not far behind was the “mid-market” of $700,000-$1M. And let’s not forget the most expensive sale at 2950 Pacific (above), which changed hands for $16M.
Most popular neighborhoods: Single-family home buyers with cash purchased their properties most frequently in the city’s southeastern areas such as Bayview and Excelsior, along with the Central Sunset and Parkside; Bernal Heights; Noe/Eureka Valleys.

Condos
2012: 570 sold (2011: 408)
Average price: $798,419
Up to $700,000: 318
$700,000 – $1M: 121
$1M – $1.5M: 85
$1.5M+ 51
The Backstory: Condo cash sales didn’t increase as dramatically, but they were still popular. The busiest price range was for properties up to $700,000. Luxury condos topped out at around $3.5M.
Most popular neighborhoods: Cash condo buyers were most prolific in Lower Pacific Heights; Pacific Heights; Marina; Downtown; Van Ness corridor; South of Market; South Beach and Mission Bay.

TICs
2012: 78 sold (2011: 68)
Average price: $648,244
$1M+ 10
The Backstory: The TIC market experienced a moderate increase in cash sales. Most sales were in the $400,000-$700,000 range.
Most popular neighborhoods: TIC buyers with cash were most commonly spotted in Russian Hill and the Mission.

2-4 Units
2012: 128 sold (2011: 89)
Average price: $1,107,348
$1.5M+ 23 sold
The Backstory: There aren’t typically a lot of lower-priced multi-unit buildings in San Francisco, so the activity in this market was all about the $1M+ range.
Most popular neighborhoods: Multi-unit purchasers frequented Noe Valley, the Mission, and the Hayes Valley area.

[Data courtesy of reported sales in the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service (MLS).]

SF Market Will Get Hotter in 2013

The San Francisco real estate market hit new highs in 2012. Activity significantly picked up over the summer, when serious multiple-offer scenarios and buyer overbidding proliferated. And I’m expecting this robust activity to continue in the coming year.

The S&P/Case-Shiller index of property values in 20 cities increased 4.3 percent from Oct 2011, the biggest 12-month advance since May 2010. It was the fifth straight month of year-over-year gains. In San Francisco, the year-over-year increase was 6.04 percent.

Indeed, home value averages were impressively high in the last quarter of 2012. A total of 672 single-family homes sold with an average price of $1,272,509 (propped up by 15 homes sold in the $5M-$28M range). Additionally, 598 condos sold at an average price of $914,198, with 23 such properties selling in the $2M-$8M range.

This year was also one during which many all-cash transactions took place, particularly in higher price ranges. For example, there were 114 single-family homes and 123 condos that sold in the last quarter for cash. As a result, it was sometimes challenging for buyers with loans to compete.

Buyers in our currently low-inventory market will welcome the return of new construction in the city, which is expected to increase in 2013-2014. As of October 2012, there were 4,200 new housing units under construction in San Francisco. Building permits for another 1,450 units have been approved, and permits for another 2,610 units have been requested. These predominantly include residential developments downtown, along the Market Street corridor in Eureka/Hayes Valleys, SoMa and South Beach.

Historically low loan interest rates, along with a growing tech sector and overall Bay Area population increase will continue to fuel demand for home purchases in 2013.

Hot San Francisco Market To Get Hotter In 2013

The San Francisco real estate market hit new highs in 2012. Activity significantly picked up over the summer, when serious multiple-offer scenarios and buyer overbidding proliferated. And I’m expecting this level of activity to continue in the coming year.

The S&P/Case-Shiller index of property values in 20 cities increased 4.3 percent from Oct 2011, the biggest 12-month advance since May 2010. It was the fifth straight month of year-over-year gains. In San Francisco, the year-over-year increase was 6.04 percent.

Indeed, home value averages were impressively high in the last quarter of 2012. A total of 672 single-family homes sold with an average price of $1,272,509 (propped up by 15 homes sold in the $5M-$28M range). Additionally, 598 condos sold at an average price of $914,198, with 23 such properties selling in the $2M-$8M range.

This year was also one during which many all-cash transactions took place, particularly in higher price ranges. For example, there were 114 single-family homes and 123 condos that sold in the last quarter for cash. As a result, it was sometimes challenging for buyers with loans to compete.

Buyers will welcome the return of new construction in the city, which will vastly increase in 2013-2014. As of October 2012, there were 4,200 new housing units under construction in San Francisco. Building permits for another 1,450 units have been approved, and permits for another 2,610 units have been requested. These predominantly include residential developments downtown, along the Market Street corridor in Eureka/Hayes Valleys, SoMa and South Beach.

Historically low loan interest rates, along with a growing tech sector and overall Bay Area population increase will continue to fuel demand for home purchases in 2013.